The Role of the Agent Provocateur
' Divide & Conquer '
Agent Provocateur: a person employed to encourage others to break the law by pretending sympathy with their aims to incite them to some incriminating action so that they can be arrested.
In recent years, mostly due to the rise of internet accessibility, the American people have been undergoing a rapid awakening. Some stories once considered so absurd that only the truest “conspiracy theorist” would dare give them mention, have been vindicated; and not only was the government aware of these misrepresentations, it was complicit in their cover-up. National debt as well as wealth inequality continue to climb and many highly educated economists warn of the US dollar’s impending collapse. Few would disagree that the United States has lost its way, as more reasons for security are declared and more constitutional rights ignored.
This decline in rights has given way to a rapid rise in community and nationwide protests. With so many beginning to become vocal about the ineptitude of the Federal Government, and many more awakening to the cause, it has become a national security priority for the US government to put an end to this subtle yet increasingly worrisome uprising of awareness. The most effective and direct action is to cast these Truth speakers and activists in the light of the biggest bogeyman of modern times: terrorism. Enter the Agent Provocateur.
Most modern protestors and activists are acutely aware of the presence of the provocateur, and it is for this reason that they will not allow for these events to turn violent, knowing full well this will give the government the very reason it needs to label them as enemies of the state. This is the exact purpose for the provocateur, to incite violence where none exists in order to both, give them an excuse to shut down the demonstration, as well as to demonize the movement to those yet to awaken to themainstream propaganda machine. This would divide the people on the issue and allow for the government to appear the savior, effectively conquering the awareness uprising.
Once the American people are indoctrinated with the kind of intolerance already being seen in regards to the Muslim faith (this coming from the nation of so-called religious tolerance), the time will be right to begin using the new CISA bill in combination with the Patriot act to unduly an unjustly detain and desist protesters, activists and Truth bloggers who are only exercising their first amendment rights. They are already beginning to be cast as anti-American or even terrorists by many of the more radical officials. With provocateurs and false flag events rising in frequency, one should begin to view any publicized event through a lens of skepticism.
There have been many documented incidents of government agents infiltrating peaceful protests pretending to be part of the movement, even going as far as to break the law themselves in order to incite crime or violence that might not have erupted otherwise. This effectively casts those simply wishing to express their concerns with a steadily eroding constitution, as what is now being labeled domestic terrorism. As can be seen in a Congressional hearing, when Ed Royce likened bloggers, conspiracy theorists and people who challenge establishment narratives on the Internet, to ISIS terrorists.
An example of this already taking place is when the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released their “domestic terrorist list” via the Southern Poverty Law Center. We Are Change, an alternative news site dedicated to covering the stories mainstream media intentionally ignores, was on that list beside neo-nazis. Now whether one agrees with the content, the site is by no means breaking the law or committing an act of terrorism, yet the owner is now labeled as one, in a situation shockingly similar to that of the Red Scare. The action of labeling a journalist as a domestic terrorist is a scary precedent to set and does not embody a democratic society. Simply reviewing the content will clearly demonstrate, that however controversial some topics might be, Mr Rudkowski is no terrorist. Quite the contrary; many proclaim writers such as Luke Rudkowski as some of the few patriots left.
Others in the current spotlight of the fight against tyranny are the Bundy family and their seizing of a government building. Some claimed immediately that the family was apsyop designed to cast the idea of a militia and the second amendment in general, in a bad and terroristic light. This does not appear to be the case, however ill-advised this occupation might be, but that is yet to be seen. Whether or not the the Bundy’s occupation is a government operation, the principle of standing up for one’s beliefs and constitutional rights against a tyrannical government is a one of paramount importance in modern America and should not be disregarded. The overreaching government arm that is the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is one of the primary reasons for this event.
In July the Hammond family was sentenced for arson for setting a regular backfire that got out of control. The BLM charged them as “Arsonal Terrorists” because it spread onto BLM lands. Some would suggest that it was because the BLM wanted their land and would go to extreme lengths to get it. This was the original reason the Bundy’s decided to get involved, to protest their injustice. Following the Hammond’s arrest, the BLM began to burn the very same lands that the Hammond family was arrested for and this time it was unsupervised, in July, without fire safety procedures to protect the life and property of residents. Homes were burned down, cattle was burned alive, and the BLM warned that if any resident interfered they would be arrested. So the families were left to scramble for what was left of their belongings and hope other live stock would survive. This is a disgusting display of totalitarian justice that should shock any who value their constitutional rights.
Now whether the Bundys legitimately desire to help the Hammonds or this was just the right opportunity to interject their intentions, this move will only serve to inadvertently further push the divide and conquer agenda. It is not hard for those who still believe in the constitution to agree with the passionate actions of the Bundys, yet this haphazard move leaves them no action except violent stand-off, and that is exactly what the establishment wants.
Then came the Oath Keepers, the Three Percenters, the Pacific Patriot Movement, and many others as they flock to be a part of the show; some claiming to be there in support, others claiming their primary objective is to mediate. Make no mistake, government agents are on the scene, most likely posing as supportive militia, until the opportune moment to lead those who will follow astray. The Bundys have been vocal about wanting the other militias to leave despite their original call for all like-minded militia to join them. Which would further suggest that one or more of the groups is not like-minded or an insurgent. Either way the risk of violent action grows with every group that arrives. Those watching from home do not differentiate between these groups, due to the coverage of the corporate media. So action from any of them, currently represents all of them, as far as the media is concerned.
The goal for those looking for a way to effect change on a level that can be felt, should focus on a peaceful detachment from the system. The establishment knows full well what to do with a violent uprising. They do not however, know what to do with a peaceful detachment. Pull back your community and reestablish what you as a community feel is the appropriate path. Similar to the peaceful revolution of the Marijuana Movement, which many feel is the catalyst that started this mass awakening to begin with.
With so many moving parts in this situation, one cannot be sure who is and who isn’t legitimate. It is possible that this entire event was orchestrated to set the stage for the next big move. An important aspect to consider is that there is misinformation being spread by the very ones meant to inform. The most important thing for the modern American to remember is that what is being sold, to put it gently, is a fugazy, a fraud, bursting at the seams with counterintelligence.
Many will continue to call this another “conspiracy theory” and they have a right to their opinion, however misguided. Yet the very use of “propaganda” was legalized in 2012, in an amendment proposed by Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) and Adam Smith (D-Wash.) and passed in the House. It effectively nullifies the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which explicitly forbids information and psychological operations aimed at influencing U.S. public opinion. That which was once considered to be immoral and illegal by politicians of the past, had been quietly legalized. This is documented, yet shockingly unreported by the corporate media.
There is no doubt that there are some within the system who genuinely have the best interest of the American people in mind. However, it is becoming apparently clear that if there are those still fighting for theAmerica we once knew, they are vastly outnumbered. When one simply considers the recent actions of Congress, an institution meant to represent the will of the people, it becomes clear where their loyalties lie; the secret TTP deal, the manipulative way CISA was passed (added last-minute to an omnibus bill designed to avoid government shutdown) despite massive resistance by voters, and the passing of a bill that allows for the pollution of a public area to not be investigated, among many others.
None of these bills were designed with the average citizen in mind, to the contrary, in every way perceivable, they help corporations and hurt everything else. This is what this nation has become.
Following 9/11, the clear line was drawn that one was either for the war, or for terrorism, and this was absolute political genius while simultaneously, diabolically evil. Nothing is that black and white yet Americans were turning on their neighbors exclaiming them terrorists for exercising their right to speak out against their government. The common phrase was uttered, “if you don’t like it then move somewhere else!” The absolute idiocy and mindless compliance this statement exudes foreshadows times to come.
Despite what one chooses to believe, there is a battle for your mind, and what you choose to believe, in the coming years, will define the world in which you live. In the world they wish to create, one will either be for or against America, there will be no third option.
Sylvester Stallone Says Obama was a “Manchurian candidate” Who Was Put in Office to Intentionally Weaken America
Sylvester Stallone says Obama was a “Manchurian candidate” Who Was Put in Office to Intentionally Weaken America
American actor and filmmaker Sylvester Stallone though that the 2016 presidential election would be the opportunity needed to get rid of something far more sinister. Stallone wrote on his Twitter profile:
“I voted, did you? Gotta get the Manchurian Candidate out of the drivers seat before were ALL soaring off a cliff into Oblivion … Be smart.”
Shortly after, he added:
“The Manchurian Candidate was a movie about fake president who was put there by foreign enemies to destroy America. Scary concept. Rise up!”
Some of his followers attacked him because he once called Barack Obama a brainwashed plant who took control of the nation as some sort of sleeper agent. But, he fired back almost immediately and wrote:
“Just mixing it up. Getting the blood going! Makes ya passionate, don’t it. Good! Happy with things? OPINIONS?”
When reporters from The Hollywood Reporter asked him to explain, he said that despite his insistence that The Manchurian Candidate was about a “fake president,” he actually meant “Manchurian candidate” as a reference to “all career politicians,” reports The Sports Hall.
After this statement, it’s not hard to guess that Stallone considers all “career politicians” to be puppets of some foreign enemy sent to destroy America from within. We respect him, but maybe he should have stopped after his insulting comments towards Barack Obama.
Aleister Crowley: The Most Wicked Man
Aleister Crowley's Bush Family Connection and His Teachings That Sill Guide America Today
“Born in 1875, Aleister Crowley had, like the Rolling Stones, rebelled against a regulated small-town background. He’d been raised in Leamington, Warwickshire, by parents who were members of the Strict Brethren, a fundamentalist Christian sect. From an early age young Aleister identified with the enemies of God in the Bible stories that were read to him. In particular he identified with the antichrist predicted in the book of Revelation. In 1898 he joined the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, a magical society.”
Most of Crowley’s adult life was dedicated to indulging in everything he believed God would hate: performing sex magic, taking heroin, opium, hashish, peyote and cocaine, invoking spirits, and even once offering himself to the Russian authorities to help destroy Christianity. He wrote volumes of books that he believed were dictated to him by a spirit from ancient Egypt called Aiwass. “To worship me take wine and strange drugs,” the spirit conveniently told him. “Lust, enjoy all things of sense and rapture. Fear not that any God shall deny thee for this.”
Aleister’s father Edward was a Brethren preacher. The young Crowley had inherited a fortune from his father, Edward Crowley who died when Aleister was eleven. From this inheritance, Aleister financed his satanic career. He began torturing and killing animals at age twelve. Crowley was a heroin addict and a sexual pervert. His Christian mother referred to him as “The Great Beast of Revelation whose number is 666,” and he was pleased with the title. He was convinced that he was the reincarnation of the magician Eliphas Levi, who died the year Crowley was born. Crowley also believed he had lived other lives, including that of Pope Alexander VI. Crowley claimed that dark powers gave him the words to his “Book of the Law.” His first wife, Rose, died in a mental asylum. His second wife also went insane. “Five mistresses committed suicide, and scores of his concubines ended in the gutter as alcoholics, drug addicts, or in mental institutions” (Hellhounds on Their Trail, p. 56).
In 1922, Crowley published Diary of a Drug Fiend, which was about the use of cocaine. He described the widespread use of cocaine among Hollywood stars, which he described as “cocaine-crazed sexual lunatics.”
As noted, Crowley died a wasted heroin addict given to rages and doubts. His last words were “I am perplexed…” Crowley worshiped the demon god Pan, the god of sexuality and lust. This was the original concept of Peter Pan, a Michael Jackson and Disney hero. His “Hymn to Pan” was read at his funeral: “I rave and I rape and I rip and I rend/ Everlasting world without end!”
Crowley believed in human sacrifice and said “A made child of perfect innocence” is the most suitable victim.
Watch this morbid video exposing Crowley:
Zepplin’s song “Stairway to Heaven” carries the reference “May Queen,” which is purportedly the name of a hideous poem written by Crowley. Paige had inscribed in the vinyl of their album Led Zeppelin III, Crowley’s famous “Do what thou wilt. So let it Be.’ Paige and Robert Plant claim some of Zeppelins’ songs came via occultic “automatic handwriting,” including their popular “Stairway to Heaven.” Crowley’s Boleskine House, which Paige purchased was once a church that burned to the ground with the congregation inside. (Humm… nice huh?) There is no Stairway to Heaven….It’s a STAIRWAY TO HELL!!!
Another thing that Crowley emphasized to his readers was that musicians into Magick (Crowley’s spelling) would be able to be musical mediums. When speaking of “Stairway to Heaven,” Robert Plant claimed to be a musical medium. He said the following about how he received the lyrics to the song: “‘I was just sitting there with Pagey in front of a fire at Headley Grange (Zepplin’s recording studio),’ Plant recalled. ‘Pagey had written these chords and he played them for me. I was holding a pencil and paper and for some reason, I was in a very bad mood. Then all of a sudden my hand was writing out the words: “There’s a lady who’s sure, all that glitters is gold, and she’s buying a Stairway to Heaven.” I just sat there and I looked at the words and I almost came out of my seat.” In 1998, the year of Page and Plant’s last world tour, Jimmy Page said the following..
(Taken from the Atlantic Records website): “When we first got back together, it was so immediately apparent that the two of us were just channeling the music. That’s what we had always had, and it was so apparent that it was there. It was almost effortless.” When commenting on the production of the album with Stairway to Heaven on it, Page made the following statement in the January 2002 issue of Guitar World magazine: “If something really magical is coming through, then you follow it.”
THE LAW OF REVERSAL
Crowley taught the Law of Reversal, which we go into in depth later. He believed in rituals carried out backwards. Remember, Stairway to Heaven has probably been around for hundreds of years in the spirit world, just waiting for the right moment to come out.. But for now, listen to Stairway to Heaven backwards…Don’t take our word for it…Listen for yourselves.
“We tried to take advantage of everything that was being offered to us.” In their channeling of the music and lyrics to Stairway to Heaven, Led Zeppelin presented the concept of worshiping the male/female godhead of the Qabalah, as taught to them by Aleister Crowley, that Lucifer is the god all over the world, irrespective of the name and that he has a female consort in the form of light; hence the lyrics: “There walks a lady we all know, who shines white light and wants to show….” The god form that they want the fan to worship in the song is Pan the Piper (also the origin of Peter Pan), the Greek God of the forests, who again, was presented by Aleister Crowley in no uncertain terms as Lucifer the Piper, the maker of music.
The worship of Lucifer, in the form of Pan, was a theme through all of Aleister Crowley’s writings. Jimmy Page has always been an open student of Crowley the Black Magician, and Led Zeppelin was his band. Following the teachings of Crowley, Jimmy Page and company were successful in placing his doctrines in many of their songs, including “Ramble On,” “Black Dog,” “The Battle of Evermore,” “Stairway to Heaven,” “No Quarter,” “The Song Remains the Same,” “Kashmir,” “In The Light,” “Achilles Last Stand,” and “Nobody’s Fault But Mine,” just to name a few. Led Zeppelin even went so far as to command their fans to sell their souls to the Devil in their concert film, “The Song Remains the Same.”
The Beatles were into Crowley’s teaching of the Law of reversal and did backmasking on many of their albums:
The cover of the Sergeant Pepper’s album by the Beatles showed a background of, according to Ringo Starr, people “we like and admire” (Hit Parade, Oct. 1976, p.14). Paul McCartney said of Sgt. Pepper’s cover, ”. . . we were going to have photos on the wall of all our HEROES . . .
If you have ever had any reservations that the Beatles are EVIL…Look at this album below which shows a dead baby ripped from limb to limb with the mutilated parts all over George, Paul, John and Ringo. You can even see the umbilical cord dangling down on Paul McCartney’s hand. This album was recalled because the butchers association complained more than anyone else…..YES! It’s DISGUSTING!
Other people who embraced the teachings of Crowley:
Ozzy Osbourne called Crowley “a phenomenon of his time” (Circus, Aug. 26, 1980, p. 26). Ozzy even had a song called “Mr. Crowley.” “You fooled all the people with magic/ You waited on Satan’s call / … Mr. Crowley, won’t you ride my white horse…”
On the back cover of the Doors 13 album, Jim Morrison and the other members of the Doors are shown posing with a bust of Aleister Crowley.
David Bowie referred to Crowley in his song “Quicksand” from the album The Man Who Sold the World.
Mick Jagger, Sings about “Sympathy for the devil” Where he clearly identifies himself as Satan…Listen to his LP! Then listen to the Stones album “Their Satanic majesty’s request”
Graham Bond thought he was Crowley’s illegitimate son and recorded albums of satanic rituals with his band Holy Magick.
Iron Maiden lead singer Bruce Dickinson said: “… we’ve referred to things like the tarot and ideas of people like Aleister Crowley” (Circus, Aug. 31, 1984). Their song “The Number of the Beast” said, “666, the number of the beast/ 666, the one for you and me.” Crowley was called the Beast.
Daryl Hall of the rock duo Hall and Oates admits that he follows Crowley. “I became fascinated with Aleister Crowley, the nineteenth-century British magician who shared those beliefs. … I was fascinated by him because his personality was the late-nineteenth-century equivalent of mine—a person brought up in a conventionally religious family who did everything he could to outrage the people around him as well as himself” (Rock Lives: Profiles and Interviews, p. 584). Hall owns a signed and numbered copy of Crowley’s The Book of Thoth (about an Egyptian god).
Sting, formerly of the Police, has spent many hours studying Crowley’s writings.
Stiv Bators, lead singer for The Dead Boys and Lords of the New Church, had a song titled “Do What Thou Wilt/ This Is the Law,” after the philosophy of Satanist Aleister Crowley. In another song Bators sang: “I heard the Devil curse/ I recognized my name.”
LSD guru Timothy Leary was a Crowley enthusiast. He said: “I’ve been an admirer of Aleister Crowley. I think that I’m carrying on much of the work that he started over a hundred years ago … He was in favor of finding yourself, and ‘Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law’ under love. It was a very powerful statement. I’m sorry he isn’t around now to appreciate the glories he started”
The Marilyn Manson song “Misery Machine” contains the lyrics, “We’re gonna ride to the abbey of Thelema.” The Abbey of Thelema was the temple of Satanist Aleister Crowley.
If ever there was a God-hating degenerate, it was Aleister Crowley …How anyone can admit to admiring this animal is beyond comprehension.
Crowley was the one who initially coined the term “New age” in his book “The Book of the Law.”
He wrote a chapter called “The New Aeon” back in 1904. Franklin D. Roosevelt was so impressed with the teachings of Crowley,(God only knows why), the President put an image Crowley designed on the back of the dollar bill. The Eye in the triangle now on the one dollar bill was created by Crowley. It is the eye of Horus (a demon) looking through the pyramid signifying a day when we are all watched by big brother under the New World Order. Around it are the words “Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum” Which in Latin says “Announcing The Birth Of The New Order Of The Ages.”
To read more about Crowley's influence on modern day music go here.
Crowley's Bizarre Bush Family Connection
Few people understand that one of the most notorious individuals in British history may have contributed to the lineage of our current president. Evidence points to the disturbing possibility that Crowley was the true father of Barbara Bush, the former First Lady and mother to George W. Bush. If you look at the below pictures, you can see the resemblance of Crowley and Bush are too apparent to dismiss. Anyone who remotely knows genetics can see these two people are related!
The story may seem difficult to believe at first, until one learns more about the social inter-relations that tied together these unlikely parties. Specifically, we must focus on a fascinating woman named Pauline Pierce.
Pauline Pierce, born Pauline Robinson, had a third child was named Barbara. Most sources divulge little about this woman. We learn more about her husband Marvin Pierce, the president of the McCall Corporation, which published McCall’s magazine and Redbook. He married Pauline, a beautiful young socialite, in 1919. Their first child, Martha, was born the next year; the second, James, was born in 1921. At this time, Aleister Crowley inhabited what must have seemed a very different world, as he embarked upon the great communal experiment of the Abbey of Thelema in Italy.
During the Abbey period, a Crowley follower had accidentally died during a magical (Crowley’s spelling) ceremony. The incident created a firestorm of unwanted publicity (the sensationalist British press labeled Crowley “The Wickedest Man in the World”), which prompted Mussolini’s government to expel Crowley and his followers from Italian soil.
When Crowley was 50 years old, he was residing in the home of Frank and Nellie O’Hara in Paris, France. In early 1924, Nellie was visited by her American friend, Pauline Pierce, the wife of Marvin Pierce, president of the McCall Corporation, which published McCall’s and Redbook magazines.
During Pauline’s visit, Crowley underwent what he termed the “supreme ordeal,” an initiation into the Masonic Ipsissimus Grade — the highest magickal achievement in his Order. The initiation rite included choosing one or more experienced attendants, charged with arousing and exhausting him sexually by every means possible, employing every artifice and stimulant. In that place and time, Nellie and Pauline were the most suited for this task.
Pauline returned to America, and on June 8, 1925, eight months after Crowley’s “supreme ordeal,” Pauline gave birth to a daughter she named Barbara. Barbara grew up to marry George H. W. Bush, who later became President of the United States. Is Aleister Crowley the father of Barbara Bush?
It’s very possible and highly likely that she knows her real father was Crowley and is working behind the scenes to carry on the agenda he started. Illuminati families are way more aware of things like this than we think they are. I suspect Crowley is indeed Barbara Bush’s real father.
Barbara Bush matches her real father, Aleister Crowley to near perfection. The face and eyes, it’s all very clear. Barbara Bush has no resemblance to Marvin Pierce (Her alleged father). But is a perfect match to Crowley. Just look at the resemblance.
To read more about the Bush-Crowley Family connection visit the Millennium Report. They uncovered a more in depth investigation on this topic.
America's Global Tyranny and Endless Atrocities
Martin Luther King’s Warning of America’s Spiritual Death
Martin Luther King Jr.’s Riverside Church speech was titled “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence.” It was delivered exactly one year before his April 4, 1968 assassination in Memphis. In the speech, King declared, “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”
“I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government.”
“I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin the shift from a ‘thing-oriented’ society to a ‘person-oriented’ society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, materialism and militarism are incapable of being conquered.
“We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time. Life often leaves us standing bare, naked and dejected with a lost opportunity. We still have a choice today; nonviolent coexistence or violent co-annihilation. We must move past indecision to action. We must find new ways to speak for peace and justice throughout the developing world a world that borders on our doors.
“If we do not act we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess power without compassion, might without morality and strength without sight.”
King pointed to an alternate path into the future:
“Now let us rededicate ourselves to the long and bitter but beautiful struggle for a new world. This is the calling of the sons of God, and our brothers wait eagerly for our response. Shall we say the odds are too great? Shall we tell them the struggle is too hard?”
- Martin Luther King Jr
George Carlin Discusses The End of America