On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at around 7:30pm I noticed a bizarre looking cloud in the sky, but I was not the only one.  Apparently, this cloud I saw was witnessed all across southern California.  The cloud was huge and was hanging very low in the sky.  Not only that, it was emitting bright flashes of lightning bolts every few seconds.  

It was the coolest looking cloud.  I've never seen anything like it. There was no sound and no other clouds visible in the sky.  It was so unusual I needed to film it and apparently, so did other people across SoCal. We were all curious about this odd cloud or weather phenomenon.  I looked it up and it's called Heat Lightning.  

According to Wikipedia:

"Heat lightning, sometimes known as silent lightning, is a misnomerused for the faint flashes of lightning on the horizon or other clouds from distant thunderstorms that do not appear to have accompanying sounds of thunder.

The actual phenomenon commonly called heat lightning is simply cloud-to-ground lightning that occurs very far away, with thunder that dissipates before it reaches the observer.  At night, it is possible to see the flashes of lightning from very far distances, up to 100 miles, but the sound does not carry that far.  In Florida, this type of lightning is often seen over the water at night, the remnants of storms that formed during the day along a sea breeze front coming in from the opposite coast." 

The entire phenomenon was witnessed across vast parts of Southern California and filmed by people in different cities and counties miles apart at the same time.  I know nothing about weather to make any speculations, but how is it possible for all of us to witness what seems to be the same exact cloud at the same exact time miles and miles apart?   Does anyone have an explanation for this?  

I compiled the videos of the cloud making its appearance all over Southern California last night.  I'm glad I wasn't the only one that found this cloud fascinating. 

Here is my video that was taken in Riverside County, CA at 7:33PM 

Here are 2 videos filmed by two different people.  One in Simi Valley, Ca at 7:53PM and one in Northridge, CA.   I looked up the distance on Google Maps and Simi Valley is 85 miles away from where  I was located. 

This is the cloud filmed in Northridge, CA. This is 71 miles away from where I am located.  They filmed this cloud around the same time I filmed mine, at 7:30PM.  How can we all see the same cloud, so far apart? I just want someone to explain the phenomenon.  I'm not saying it's not possible.  I just find it very odd and I'm looking for an explanation.  

Here are the rest of the videos I found that people posted around the same time in various cities.  Check them out.  I would love to know what you think.

Anaheim, CA

Pasadena, CA

Van Nuys, CA

Chino, CA

East Los Angeles, CA

The video, posted by Julian Lopez, appears to show a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department helicopter circling around an unidentified flying object, which some observers say may be an advertisement for marijuana products. 

Fox 11 reports that the object was seen floating over the San Gabriel Valley on the morning of Aug. 28.

On the video, Lopez can be heard saying: “A helicopter is circling it. It looks like a big eyeball.”  

I have no idea if this has been debunked or not, but I thought I would share the video in case it is a legit sighting.  Check it out.

An incredible 30 second video clip shows intriguing sky action that allegedly took place on August 18th, 2017 in the Phoenix, Arizona area. We’ve been working to track down the original posting location of the video but have not yet been able to. If anyone knows who took the video below, please contact us as we’d love to ask a few questions. 

In this sighting you will see 5 crafts in the sky in a ‘W’ like formation. They then move around the sky and then the video abruptly ends. As a long time explorer and researcher of the UFO phenomenon let me be the first to say “I really want to see the end of this video.”

This is some of the most clear and intriguing footage I have seen, not to say there aren’t a lot of great videos out there, but more so that this video gives a clear example of the stunning sightings that have been taking place over the last 10 years in increased frequencies.
​
The first question that popped into my mind when I saw this video was “why hasn’t this been reported anywhere else?” Good question. When I looked around I wasn’t able to find any other videos or articles related to this sighting. But, this was also the case with another sighting we were sent back in April of 2017. It also took place in Phoenix and shortly after our article went out, more experiencers of the sighting reported on it. Soon the mainstream news reported on it, but claimed it was just a meteor breaking up and falling through the sky.

This is the thing with UFO sightings; many people see them and don’t record, report or tell anyone about them. I’ve seen a number of sightings in my life that came during CE-5 expeditions I used to do in my hometown years ago. We never brought cameras and thus never had media of it, yet we would often see between 8 and 10 crafts show up each time. We took the time to learn the difference between satellites, planes etc. so we could properly identify what we were seeing. Some of the most stunning sightings I’ve ever had were done during those expeditions, and yet none were recorded or published.

Think within yourself, how many times have you seen something you thought you were certain was a UFO yet never reported or told anyone about it?
​
Check out the video of the August 18th, 2017 sighting and be sure to read on below to discover why I think the UFO & ET phenomenon is by far one of the most important things happening to humanity right now.

UFO Enthusiast Now Facing Child Pornography Charges Is Subject of Netflix Documentary Stan Romanek, a prominent self-proclaimed "alien abductee", says his computer was hacked in a government conspiracy to silence him.Stan Romanek, a prominent 54-year-old UFO enthusiast who claims to have been abducted by aliens “several times”, is set to face trial in Colorado on charges of possessing and distributing child pornography.

Romanek gained a certain newfound renown ahead of his 31 July 2017 trial date when Netflix released a feature-length documentary recounting 15 years’ worth of alleged extraterrestrial and supernatural encounters. Extraordinary: The Stan Romanek Story was originally made in 2013 by Seattle director Jon Sumple but not added to Netflix until July 2017, which in turn exposed the documentary — and the man — to the streaming website’s nearly 100 million subscribers. 

The film is a series of vignettes without voiceover narration (all of which are presented as “mesmerizing” evidence) dating back to 2000. In dozens of home videos, photographs and interviews, often accompanied by dramatic classical music, director Jon Sumple presents “evidence” of unidentified flying object sightings, encounters with little green men in Romanek’s home, flying orbs, ghostly voices, and the purported alien abductions that have brought him public attention in the past.
The body of evidence is primarily made up of easy-to-fake, even occasionally laughable images of aliens and mysterious faces appearing in the background of photos; “lights in the sky” with mundane likely explanations; and the standard material of UFO hoaxes: lawn circles, abduction flashbacks revealed under hypnosis, and “abduction” wounds. 

Indeed, Romanek’s claims have been challenged or debunked on a few occasions. In 2009, he was asked by ABC News to submit a purported alien implant in his leg to medical examination. When the time came, Romanek claimed it had disappeared from his body. The Rocky Mountain Paranormal research group recreated a famous video produced by Romanek, purporting to show a little green man peeking in his window. The groups claims they reenacted the video for $90. And in 2015, Romanek was forced to admit that he faked “moving objects” that appeared in the background of an earlier interview.

In a further twist, he explained the hoax by claiming that authorities had intimidated him into discrediting himself:

“Starseed”
This particular UFO yarn goes beyond the norm, however. As if to address the obvious question as to why Romanek has been singled out for attention by extraterrestrial visitors over the years, the documentary presents a bizarre narrative, with the 54-year-old at the centre of a shady benevolent conspiracy to protect him from his own stubborn curiosity, after he moves into the “backyard” of a group of aliens in Colorado Springs.

This is manifested in a series of phone conversations with a disembodied woman’s voice, in a clipped, upper-class English accent, who addresses Romanek with the apparent codename “Starseed.”

“Now listen, Starseed,” the voice says, “You know you are different. Follow your instincts and stay alert. This is too important. Soon it will all be revealed. And Starseed, do not be afraid of what you are.”
At the same time, Romanek presents himself as being the target of an equally shady conspiracy to silence him, finding himself victim to hacking, harassment, intimidation and even assault. There are fleeting visits and phone calls from mysterious little girls. One, named “Kioma”, introduces herself as one of Romanek’s nine alien daughters, seven of whom are duplicates. At the documentary’s conclusion, Stan Romanek is presented as a prophet of sorts, whose mission is to convey a “spiritual message” from a group of extraterrestrials in order to help humanity evolve. 

The movie’s epilogue is therefore all the more jarring: “On February 13, 2014,” a subtitle reads, “Stan Romanek was arrested on child pornography charges.”

‘Several of these girls are very young and unmistakably children’
Romanek and his wife Lisa deny the charges, and have claimed their home computer was hacked in an effort to silence him and warn other “experiencers” (alien abductees) not to speak out. Authorities tell a different story. “Romanek was arrested on a warrant that was issued on February 12, 2014,” a Loveland, Colorado Police press release reads:
​
The warrant was further progression of an eight month long investigation of the online sharing and possession of child pornography that included the execution of a search warrant in April 2013. The search warrant was executed at Romanek’s home and followed several tips that were provided by Homeland Security that were then investigated further by Loveland Police detectives and the Northern Colorado Regional Forensics Laboratory.

In 2008, Homeland Security Special Agent Darrel Franklin discovered images traced from a peer-to-peer file-sharing network to Romanek’s IP address, which showed “very young girls being sexually assaulted,” according to a Loveland Police report cited in a Huffington Post investigation. Local law enforcement were hamstrung in their ability to investigate further, however, because Loveland Police did not have a cyber crimes unit at the time.

In 2013, Franklin allegedly found child pornography once again could be traced to Romanek’s computer. The report reads:

The pictures contained images of girls that spanned an age range of approximately 5 years old to approximately 12 years old. In each of these photos, the girls are posed in a seductive manner and are exposing their breasts and genitalia. Several of these girls are very young and unmistakably children.
This time, the recently-established cyber crimes unit was able to serve a search warrant on the Romaneks’ home in April of that year, but lead investigator Brian Koopman found the computer’s hard drive had been erased. However, investigators later reportedly found hundreds of images depicting child pornography on USB sticks and similar videos on a laptop, and Romanek was arrested in February 2014.

The Trials of Detective Brian Koopman
That erased hard drive prompted the next bizarre chapter in the saga, when it emerged that Tammy Fisher (a former Loveland police officer) had befriended the Romaneks during 2012 and 2013, and had met with them as well as exchanged text messages with Lisa Romanek “at critical times” during the child pornography investigation.

Koopman suspected that Fisher had tipped off the Romaneks to an impending search of their home, culminating in the hard drive being wiped; he subsequently applied for a search warrant on Fisher’s phone records, but the investigation of his former colleague did not progress.

Fisher then sued Koopman and Loveland Police Chief Luke Hecker alleging malicious prosecution without probable cause, and accused Hecker of improperly training and supervising Koopman. After a protracted legal battle, the US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled in May 2017 that a District Court had been right to dismiss Fisher’s case.

Adding fuel to the Romaneks’ claims of police and government corruption and cover-up, Detective Brian Koopman has been the subject of other allegations in the intervening years. In April 2016, he was eventually cleared on charges of attempting to influence a public official as part of a 2013 murder investigation, the Loveland Reporter-Herald reported:

The testimony in question is one in which Koopman discussed a Walgreens surveillance video in a preliminary hearing to establish probable cause for the stalking charge pressed against Wallace. Koopman said during the September 2014 hearing that Wallace was in the store at the same time that Gray and her friend Gabrielle Burlingham were, approximately three days before Gray was murdered in her home.

He filed a corrective affidavit on the same day Wallace pleaded guilty. Prosecuting attorneys argued he lied in that document when he stated the various reasons for his initial inaccurate testimony.
In January 2017, a U.S. District Court judge dismissed a long-running lawsuitagainst Koopman by Joshua Myers, who claimed the detective violated his constitutional rights during a 2007 arrest on suspicion of running a meth lab when Koopman was an investigator in the Larimer County Drugs Task Force.

The investigation collapsed and Myers was released after a lab test revealed that a substance seized during the arrest was sugar, not methamphetamine. 
Stan Romanek has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. His wife Lisa has vowed to make extraterrestrial conspiracy theories a part of the trial, saying “We will be taking UFOlogy into the courtroom.” It remains to be seen whether Romanek’s attorneys will also make the trials of Brian Koopman a part of the defense. 

Read More

Today’s UFO news focuses on a bizarre UFO sighting off the Atlantic Coast of the United States, where two commercial pilots attempted to communicate with a UFO by using the lights of their aircraft, according to a report filed with the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), and one pilot believes that they succeeded in doing so. The two pilots, who for obvious reasons given the history of UFO news reports, have chosen remain anonymous. Their UFO report outlines a 10-minute sighting that occurred off the coastline nearest to Atlantic City, New Jersey, during a routine flight from New York to Miami the day after Christmas.

The details included in the report are both professional and appear to be highly reliable. The pilots describe the altitude of their aircraft, the weather, and a detailed report about how the UFO appeared to them. Like many other UFO reports over the last two months, this UFO disappears.

“At first sight the light was approximately at our 1 o’clock position. It moved to 12, 10, 11, back to 12. At that time, the light appeared to move North, then south at a pretty rapid rate. Or I would describe it as closer and further from our position as the size seemed to get larger and smaller. The light ended in the 1st position and then moved out east and once at our 10 o’clock position disappeared.”

In this description, the pilots are clearly establishing a fast-moving UFO, as earlier in the report the pilot commenting established that his aircraft was moving at Mach 0.80. In civilian terms, the pilots are traveling at over 600 miles per hour. That means that the UFO in this news report is moving at a rate of speed that likely exceeded Mach 1, or breaking the sound barrier, many times in order to close the distances both toward and away from the commercial airliner. At this point, the pilot who was captain on this flight turns the report from interesting to astonishing.

“The other pilot stated he could see an orange/red flash in between the white flashes. We did flash our lights at it a few times, and the other pilot believes it flashed back in sequence; I felt the return flashes were probably coincidental, but possible. The flashing didn’t really appear to have any pattern. The whole incident lasted a minimum of 10 minutes.”